By Sharon (Yu Chun) Zhen
Edwin Cifuentes, a contracted valet worker at the Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, said many valet workers who are being transferred away from UCLA are worried their new jobs will not offer them the same wages or benefits UCLA provided.
“They have family with medical problems. Being at UCLA, they have health insurance,” he said. “Moving out, they’ll have to pay (for health insurance) and they may not have health insurance.”
In August, UCLA ended its contract with ABM, a facility management company that employed valet workers like Cifuentes at the Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center. Although ABM had employed about 80 valet workers at the hospital, the university created about 35 in-house positions and has also hired part-time student workers.
Workers UCLA did not rehire are set to leave by Oct. 30, said Victoria Salgado, union organizer at American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Local 3299, the UC’s largest union.
Several valet workers said they think UCLA ended the contract with ABM because it was no longer cost-effective to hire contracted workers after their wages were raised.
In 2015, the University of California introduced the Fair Wage/Fair Work Plan, which requires that employees who work at least 20 hours a week, including contracted workers, be paid at least $15 per hour. Valet workers at the hospital originally did not receive $15 an hour, but received retroactive pay in 2016 after AFSCME submitted surveys on their behalf to state auditors.
However, UCLA Administrative Vice Chancellor Michael Beck said in a submission to the Daily Bruin in August that UCLA insourced its valet services to keep jobs within the university. Beck added ABM said it will relocate employees to other locations.
UCLA spokespeople did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
John de los Angeles, communications director for AFSCME, said when workers interviewed for the inhouse positions at UCLA, UCLA management discouraged workers from participating in union activities. In return, AFSCME issued a cease and desist letter in July.
“The issue here is that these workers were being shorted on wages – it was wage theft for nine months. That’s not a small thing – that’s labor violation,” he said. “And when they spoke up about it, the UC decided to end their contract, though (it was) not a direct layoff.”
For the full article, click on the link below.
[Source]: Daily Bruin
Last modified: October 20, 2017